

Opinion
Knowledge economy vs religion economy: Between Nigeria and the world
IN today’s world economy, the contradiction between the knowledge economy and the religion economy presents a compelling narrative that determines every nation’s development. While some countries’ development relies on their innovation, scientific advancement, and investment in education skills, Nigeria seems stuck in a cycle of dependency on religious favour, neglecting the human intellect and creativity they are blessed with. Nations practising the knowledge economy are nations that have harnessed the power of human intellect, innovation and education to drive economic growth and prosperity. They are trained to ask questions, research, and proffer solutions regardless of the situation.
Japan, a true example, stands as a proof to the transformative potential of the Knowledge Economy. Even with its lack of substantial natural resources, Japan leveraged its skills in technology, research, and development to emerge as one of the world’s most prosperous nations, with zero tolerance for religious extremists. In contrast to Nigeria’s reliance on divine intervention, Japan’s success is based on critical thinking, problem-solving, scientific research, and continuous learning. Japanese society has always prioritized education, investing heavily in research institutions, and promoting a conducive environment for technological innovation and development. This has not only helped Japan sustain its economy but also influenced its global markets with its rapid advancements in automotive, electronics, and robotics industries.
On the opposite, the religion economy shows a cycle of dependency on divine intervention while neglecting the promising potential of human intellect and ingenuity. Nigeria, often cited as one of the world’s examples, grapples with systemic issues stemming from her over-reliance on religious faith to address socio-economic challenges. Coveting the development of other countries while asking “God When?” without taking any steps towards emulating the development process. Despite being blessed with abundant natural resources, over 60 years after independence, Nigeria lags in overall development, plagued by corruption, poverty, and infrastructural decay, and still categorised as a developing country. The continuous collapse of industries and the rise in the number of religious institutions in Nigeria proves the influence of the religion economy, where leaders and citizens await divine interventions for intellectual solutions. The reliance of Nigerians on faith-based solutions not only deters progress but also increases the socio-economic disparities, degrading Nigeria to the level of the “poverty capital of the world.” Using Israel and Saudi Arabia as case studies proves the notion that religious affiliation prevents economic prosperity. Despite their religious significance as the birthplaces of Christianity and Islam, respectively, both nations embraced the knowledge economy, leveraging innovation and strategic investments to bolster their economies.
Israel is renowned for its development of technology and defence, signifying the cordial relationship between knowledge and economic development. Through investments in research and development, Israel has emerged as a global leader in cybersecurity, agriculture, and medical technology, promoting economic growth and technological innovation. Similarly, Saudi Arabia and the UAE have made significant strides in diversifying their economies beyond oil dependence, they prioritize investments in education, infrastructure, and technological innovation. The UAE, in particular, is currently known as a hub for innovation and entrepreneurship, catalysing economic growth through initiatives such as Dubai’s Knowledge Village and Abu Dhabi’s Masdar City. In contradiction to the successes of Japan, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, Nigeria’s adherence to the Religion Economy has enabled a cycle of underdevelopment and stagnation. Despite its vast potential, rather than development, Nigeria continues to grapple with several minor issues ranging from corruption and unemployment to inadequate infrastructure and healthcare- all man-made issues that can be solved with human intellects and research if well funded, yet citizens await divine intervention for solutions.
Rather than provide funding for development, Nigerian leaders continue to allocate substantial resources for religious tourism and religious infrastructure. In 2022, A Nigerian state governor spent N24 Billion Naira on erecting a worship centre in the oil rich Niger/Delta region when the people have no access to pipe-borne water. Same year, another state governor subsidised Hajj pilgrimages for citizens to the tune of N20billion. These further buttressed the point of Nigerian leaders’ misplaced priorities. This money could have been invested in education, research, innovation, and sustainable development. Rather, Nigeria squanders resources on religious issues that offer fleeting solace but do little to address the root causes of poverty and underdevelopment. The comparison of the Knowledge Economy and the Religion Economy serves as a wake-up call for Nigeria to reassess their economic priorities and embrace knowledge and innovation, the path to development and growth. While religious faith and spirituality hold huge value for the citizens and should not be ignored, they must not overshadow investment in human capital, education, and technological advancement.
Nigeria, blessed with millions of intellectuals who are sought-after all around the globe, should harness its abundant resources and human potential to advance itself towards prosperity and national development. Embracing the Knowledge Economy by prioritising investments in education, research, and infrastructure, Nigeria can transcend the bondage of the Religion Economy and fully embrace her title as the ‘Giant of Africa’.
Adeleye writes in from London, United Kingdom, via maxwelladeleye@gmail.com.
Opinion
2027: Echocho, Service to ‘kingdom on bended knees’ and the way to go

By Atekojo Samson Usman
It is obvious that the political sad story of Igala Kingdom in Kogi East today is traceable to travesty and malady of the past gullible leaders and not realizing to proffer solution would continue to elongate illusion of desires and opportunities.
Kogi East politically is on bended knees desiring to be rescued not just to take over governance at the State level which it assumed for 16 years, but how well such lofty opportunities are harnessed to advance the wellbeing of the Igala/Bassa nation and by extension Kogi State generally.
The only string of joy the Igala/Bassa Kingdom has currently is the strong and virile representation at the 10th Senate being saddled by Senator Jibrin Isah Echocho. If he wasn’t such a committed and passionate Senator, it would have been such a traumatic and worrisome development for Kogi East that was once the pride of the State and the nation in general.
Alas, indicators have shown that the Kingdom’s nightmares are far from over or its readiness to reboot the political sagacity that was once in vogue in the days of Dr Steven Makoji Achema of the blessed memory and the late Prince Abubakar Audu, given the web of dangerous politicking pervading the land out of utter hatred for each other.
The 2027 general election is fast approaching and the Kogi East’s seeming hemorrhage of ideas on what to do at all strata of politics would pose “no change”, and dangerously too, that some sponsored social media irritants are well bent on desecrating political leaders and engaging in pull him down subterfuge. Sadly, opinion moulders have disappeared from the scene, even as ‘wise men from the East’ are nowhere to be found to encourage the political leaders who are doing well and to offer counsel on way forward.
At this critical times, one expects that a modicum of intelligence would understand that Senator Echocho’s legislative activities in the Senate since 2019 has been the only saving grace, hence, offering him ‘the first of right refusal’ for the 2027 general election should be the way to go for now.
It is axiomatic that the 2027 general election which every ‘Jack Robinsons’ are sponsoring campaign of calumnies as strategies to reposition themselves to contest the 2027 Senate can only be safe with Senator Jibrin Isah Echocho. This is because, it would be too costly to trade away Kogi East representation at the Senate, and given that it is the only highest political office for Igala/Bassa kingdom for now.
Criticism of political office holders at all level is good if it is done constructively, but in the case where fact speaks for itself in terms of performance in office, ‘res ipsa loquitor’, then criticism becomes destructive if it is done to purposely paint the leader as the demon hindering the progress of Igala/Bassa land.
Statistics show that Kogi East with nine Local Government Councils is one of the highest Senatorial flank in the country, hence, any representative at the Red Chamber of the National Assembly must be more than a servant leader to dutifully serve the people.
Entrusting the Senatorial District to an untrusted and untested hand as the Kingdom approach the 2027 general election would be a risk and more than a political suicide at this precarious time. That is why wisdom demands that the people, the socio-cultural group, religious groups and political stakeholders should rally round the political leaders for support, ask questions on their activities where some issues are unclear in order to move the Kingdom forward.
Of particular interest in this piece is the Kogi East Senatorial District currently occupied by Senator Jibrin Isah Echocho, who one could proudly say has been doing surprisingly well at the Red Chamber and back home in the district. Any adult who was a living witness to the debut of democracy in 1999 till date is challenged to place performance index of Kogi East Senators side by side and you will discover that none in the past is match for the current Senator. Let the truth be told for once!
Though, this is an opinionated piece, if this is believed ‘hook line and sinker’ as could be seen in motions, resolutions the Senator has sponsored in his first and second term of office and the massive constituency projects in the district as well as personal and official intervention in dire conditions of the constituents, one would discover that the narrative has changed.
Before the Senate went on Sallah and Easter recess, Senator Echocho sponsored a bill to establish National Cashew Production and Research Institute to be cited at Idah in Kogi East. The bill has passed first reading on the floor of the Red Chamber and one expect Cashew Produce association, stakeholders and traditional rulers not only to be excited, but rally round the Senator to ensure that the bill is passed into the law.
This is notwithstanding the fact that the proposed National Cashew Production and research Institute comes with job opportunities as well as infrastructural development in Igala/Bassa land.
Lawmaking encompasses participation of the constituents as they have opportunity to participate in public hearing after the bill has passed second reading before the third reading. It is important to see good things in one who is doing well on his beat and if he seeks a return, it is good enough to grant it.
One of the advantages of returning a lawmaker is that a bill he sponsored and is passed into law, if it is not assented to by the President for it to become an act, the same bill would have accelerated hearing to its passage if re-presented.
Atekojo Samson Usman is a journalist and writes from Abuja. He can be reached through: ateko2007@gmail.com
Opinion
Security: The Nuhu Ribadu formula

By Zayyad I. Muhammad
Before the emergence of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration, Nigeria’s security architecture was grappling with deeply entrenched challenges, particularly in the Northwest and Southeast regions.
The situation had deteriorated to alarming levels, with criminal elements and secessionist movements establishing a disturbing level of control in certain areas.
In the Northwest, banditry had evolved from sporadic attacks to the full-scale occupation of territories. Vast stretches of land, especially in states like Kaduna, Zamfara, and Niger, fell under the influence of heavily armed groups.
The Abuja-Kaduna highway which was once a vital economic and commuter route, became a perilous stretch, notorious for frequent kidnappings and ambushes.
The security threats extended further, with the Kaduna–Birnin Gwari–Lagos road effectively shut down due to sustained bandit activity. Even commercial life suffered significantly; the Birnin Gwari cattle market, a major hub for livestock trade, was forced to cease operations under the pressure of violence and extortion.
Meanwhile, in the Southeast, the situation was compounded by the secessionist agitation led by the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB).
Through fear and coercion, IPOB succeeded in enforcing a weekly sit-at-home directive across several states in the region, paralyzing economic activities every Monday. Businesses were shuttered, schools closed, and the freedom of movement was severely curtailed, undermining both governance and development efforts.
This was the grim reality inherited by the Tinubu administration. However, at the heart of the renewed fight against insecurity stands a strategic recalibration: what many now refer to as the “Nuhu Ribadu Formula.”
As National Security Adviser, Ribadu brought a fresh, intelligence-driven approach to tackling Nigeria’s security woes. With an emphasis on coordination among security agencies, restoration of public confidence, and targeted offensives against criminal enclaves, his methods have begun yielding tangible results.
While challenges persist, especially in remote and hard-to-reach areas, the difference in tone and trajectory is becoming increasingly clear. The Ribadu-led security strategy has not only focused on reclaiming territory but also on addressing the root causes of unrest; be it poverty, weak governance, or community grievances. It is this multidimensional and proactive approach that may well define Nigeria’s path to lasting peace and stability.
Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, the National Security Adviser, has been pivotal in reshaping Nigeria’s national security framework through a clear and strategic vision built on three foundational pillars.
The first is the carrot-and-stick approach, which balances kinetic (military force) and non-kinetic (dialogue, reconciliation, and development) strategies. This dual-pronged method recognizes that not all security threats can be resolved through force alone.
By combining targeted military operations with community engagement and deradicalization efforts, the approach aims to neutralize threats while addressing the root causes of violence.
The second strategy is a shift from rhetoric to action, a deliberate move away from endless briefings and political grandstanding towards concrete, measurable outcomes.
Under Ribadu’s watch, security interventions are now judged not by promises, but by performance. The focus is on restoring peace, reclaiming lost territories, and enabling displaced persons to return to their communities.
Third is the promotion of synergy and intelligence sharing among security agencies. Previously plagued by inter-agency rivalry and fragmented operations, Nigeria’s security forces are now operating with improved coordination.
Through unified command structures and shared intelligence platforms, responses have become faster, more precise, and increasingly proactive.
These strategies have already begun to yield visible results. The recent resurgence of attacks in Plateau and Benue States, as well as isolated Boko Haram assaults on soft targets in Borno and Adamawa, were swiftly countered using the same framework. Rapid deployment of forces, community-based intelligence, and coordinated operations prevented escalation and restored calm.
Still, the road to full recovery is a gradual one. While the machinery of state security has clearly been retooled, the average citizen may not immediately perceive these gains. Part of the challenge lies in the persistence of outdated or unverified reports in some sections of the media, which can paint a distorted picture of the current realities. Nevertheless, those on the ground, especially in previously hard-hit areas, are beginning to sense a shift.
The “Nuhu Ribadu Formula” is proving to be more than just a tactical adjustment; it is an evolving doctrine that prioritizes effectiveness, accountability, and collaboration. With sustained implementation and public support, it could well become the blueprint for enduring peace in Nigeria.
Zayyad I. Muhammad writes from Abuja, zaymohd@yahoo.com, 08036070980